Journalism of Science

CJR November/December 2004: Blinded by Science
Well, this piece pinpoints a few of the issues in the gap between “journalism” and “science” including incompatibilities of requirements from one end or the other. What’s perhaps more interesting, though, is that it remains very close to a rather shallow perspective on the very notion of science which, caricatured, runs something like “Science is the accumulation of knowledge from credentialed Scientists who have published in well-known peer-reviewed journals” as opposed to “science is a method used to understand different phenomena.” Carl Sagan and others have very interesting pieces on science and the fringes. More thoughtful and very “current.” But they probably wouldn’t sell subscriptions to journals or papers…

About enkerli

French-speaking ethnographer, homeroaster, anthropologist, musician, coffee enthusiast. View all posts by enkerli

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: