Just because this might be useful in the future…
I perceive a number of academic disciplines to be “ethnographic” in the sense that they use the conceptual and epistemic apparatus of “ethnography.” (“Ethnography” taken here as an epistemological position in human research, not as “the description of a people” in either literary or methodological uses.)
I don’t mean by this that practitioners are all expected to undertake ethnographic field research or that their methods are exclusively ethnographic. I specifically wish to point out that ethnography is not an “exclusive prerogative” of anthropology. And I perceive important connections between these disciplines.
In no particular order:
- Ethnolinguistics (partly associated with Linguistic Anthropology)
- Ethnocinematography (partly associated with Visual Anthropology)
- Ethnology (Cultural Anthropology)
The following disciplines (the “micros”), while not ethnographic per se, often have ethnographic components at the present time.
Health research and market research also make frequent use of ethnographic methods, these days (especially through “qualitative data analysis” software). But I’m not clear on how dedicated these researchers are to the epistemological bases for ethnography.
It may all sound very idiosyncratic. But I still think it works, as a way to provide working definitions for disciplines and approaches.
Thoughts, comments, suggestions, questions?