Wow! I’m speechless!
Tag Archives: selfishness
Banality of Heroism
5 Comments | tags: academic research, achievements, American exceptionalism, anarchy, atheism, bands, constructionism, contextualism, discrimination, egalitarianism, egocentrism, enculturation, end of innocence, envy, essentialism, face-saving, free will, gangs, grassroots movements, greed, heroism, hierarchy, idealism, identity negotiation, institutionalism, judgment, labeling, moral relativism, moralism, non-conformism, ordered anarchy, organic relationships, peer pressure, personality, power, roles, self-importance, self-righteousness, selfishness, social amnesia, social pressure, social status, social structure, social support, socialisation, socio-constructivism, stigmatisation, subversion, teams, universalism, wisdom of crowds | posted in activism, Christopher Lydon, Communities, constructivism, ethics, ethnocentrism, experimentation, groupthink, humanism, identity, individualism, informal learning, intellectualism, intellectuals, naïveté, networking, Radio Open Source, relativism, satisfaction, social butterfly effect, social change, social contract, social dynamics, social mobility, social networks, sociocentrism
(Rant) Fold It! Fold It Riiight There!
Don’t get me wrong. I do love children. Children are the reason I feel optimistic about the future of humankind. And what I tend to call championship strollers do have a place. In parks, on bike paths, and in wide open spaces. It’s just that this place is not, I repeat not in subways, busses, and other means of public transportation. At least, not fully opened. During rush hour. In a crammed space. With parents oblivious to the fact that their presence is an annoyance to dozens of fellow passengers.
Hey you, the new parent! If you’re taking your stroller on the bus or in the subway at rush hour you are allowed to fold it up so that it takes as little space as possible. You could also do as if it were a bicycle and take it to the last car of the subway. No harm in that! Or you could wait for rush hour to be over. In fact, you can even be considerate to other people and make sure that your stroller isn’t too much in the way.
Should a baby really take more space than five adults in a public space?
Gah! Some parents are so self-obsessed! I mean, rugged individualism is one thing. But consideration for fellow human beings goes a long way to improve everyone‘s quality of life.
Again, you don’t necessarily need to use a smaller umbrella-style stroller to use in public transportation. And it’s quite understandable that you need the best possible carrying system so as to not strain your back carrying your baby. But there is such a thing as noticing that the world doesn’t revolve around your very own child. Yes, every child is a precious gift. But can you imagine what would happen if every single child were treated the same way as yours?
Of course, people will call me a kid-hater or some worse thing. But I’m not angry at all! Really! In fact, when I gave my seat so a father could sit with his baby and take less space than his wife and their championship stroller were taking, I was smiling. Not a smug smile, mind you. More of a “children are so cute” smile. But when this lovely couple left their “we take no prisoners” stroller unattended while they became extremely attentive to their very quiet and happy baby, I couldn’t help but think that such a natural thing as parenthood could become an excuse for ignoring the rest of the world. And there’s a point at which ignoring the rest of the world can lead to angst, frustration, and conflict.
Not to mention that there are much better ways to carry a baby in a crowd! Some of them are even stylish…
2 Comments | tags: annoyances, championship strollers, momoirs, parenthood, politeness, public transportation, rudeness, selfishness, strollers | posted in individualism, ramblings, rants, social contract
Pages
-
Archives
- October 2013
- November 2012
- February 2012
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005